Subject(s)
Vaccination Refusal/legislation & jurisprudence , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Pandemics , Punishment , QuebecABSTRACT
Mandatory school vaccination policies with exclusion of unvaccinated students can be a powerful tool in ensuring high vaccination rates. Some parents may object to mandatory vaccination policies, claiming exemptions based on medical, religious, or philosophical reasons. Individual schools, school systems, or local or regional governments have different policies with respect to whether, and what kind of, exemptions may be allowed. In the setting of the current pandemic, questions regarding the acceptability of exemptions have resurfaced, as schools and local governments struggle with how to safely return children to school. Anticipating that school attendance will be facilitated by the development of a vaccine, school systems will face decisions about whether to mandate vaccination and whether to permit exemptions. The American Academy of Pediatrics promulgates policy favoring the elimination of nonmedical exemptions generally in schools. This discussion considers whether schools should eliminate nonmedical exemptions to vaccination as proposed in the American Academy of Pediatrics policy, ultimately concluding that broad elimination of exemptions is not justified and advocating a more nuanced approach that encourages school attendance while promoting vaccination and broader public health goals.
Subject(s)
Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Immunization Programs/ethics , Schools/ethics , Vaccination Refusal/ethics , Vaccination/ethics , Adolescent , Attitude to Health , Child , Humans , Immunization Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Parents , Schools/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccination Refusal/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Informed consent for CoViD-19 vaccines can be considered a step that can help us focus on an increasingly burdensome problem for contemporary medicine: the difficult relationship of trust between citizens and academic medicine. Filling out forms full of useless information cannot replace the rebuilding of trust based on shared essential ethical principles. Trust needs to be protected by a transparent accountability, which can also decrease the threatening looming of lawsuits. Medicine must be safe, first and foremost, for the practitioner. He cannot practice it if he feels constantly in check, if the outcome of the treatment does not correspond to the wishes of those who request it.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , Informed Consent/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Trust , Vaccination Refusal/psychology , Attitude to Health , France , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Italy , Liability, Legal , Public Opinion , Vaccination Refusal/legislation & jurisprudenceABSTRACT
Ontario families are required to provide up-to-date vaccination records as children begin schooling. Exemptions are allowed on both medical and nonmedical (religious or philosophical) grounds. In a recent report, Toronto Public Health (2019) called for an end to nonmedical exemptions - a proposal some allege infringes the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms right to freedom of religion and conscience. This paper explores whether and to what extent vaccine refusal is protected under the Charter and argues that the elimination of nonmedical exemptions can be justified under Section 1 of the Charter. The issue of mandatory vaccination may take on special urgency in the coming months and years, if and when a vaccine is found for COVID-19.